![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

Input (Gate-source loop):
-VGG – IGRG – VGS = 0
since IG = 0 A VGG = - VGS
Ouput (Drain-source loop):
VDD – IDRD – VDS = 0
RD = VDD - VDS/ ID
Shockley’s Equation:
ID = IDSS ( 1 – VGS/VP ) 2
Parameters Used:
VP = -3.5V VGG = -1V
VDD = 25V VDS = 12.5V
IDSS = 8 mA
..IDSS is expressed in EWB as conductance coefficient (b):
b = IDSS/|VP|2
b = 8mA/|-3.5|2
b = 0.000653 , this is the value given in the FET characterisitics
Computing for ID:
..in order to ensure that our FET is in proper operation, VGG = -1V is chosen which is approximately one-thirds of the pinch-off voltage and an ID which is half of the maximum drain current.
ID = IDSS ( 1 – VGS/VP ) 2
Since VGG = 1V , VGS = -1V ID = 8mA [ 1 – (-1/-3.5) ] 2
ID = 4.082 mA
Computing for RD:
Resistors are external components of the circuit, therefore assigning resistance values in design is greatly discouraged.
RD = VDD - VDS/ID
RD = 25V – 12.5V/4.082mA
RD = 3.07 kΩ
…standard coimmercial values can be used in actual design, but for the purpose of accuracy of results between the computed and simulated value, rounding off of values is avoided.
Simulated Output:

Computed Values: VGS = -1V VDD = 25V
VDS = 12.5V ID = 4.082 mA
RD = 3.07 kΩ
The simulated and computed values closely match. RG does not need any strenous computation since it is only present to ensure that Vi ( ac voltage input) appears at the input io the FET ampflifier.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Input (Gate-source loop):
– IGRG – VGS -IDRS = 0
since IG = 0 A VGS = -IDRS
Ouput (Drain-source loop):
VDD – IDRD – VDS - IDRS = 0
RD = VDD - VDS - IDRS /ID
Parameters Used:
VP = -3.5V VGS = -1V
VDD = 25V VDS = 12.5V
IDSS = 8 mA
..IDSS is expressed in EWB as conductance coefficient (b):
b = IDSS/|VP|2
b = 8mA/|-3.5|2
b = 0.000653 , this is the value given in the FET characterisitics
Computing for ID:
..in order to ensure that our FET is in proper operation, VGG = -1V is chosen which is approximately one-thirds of the pinch-off voltage and an ID which is half of the maximum drain current.
ID = IDSS ( 1 – VGS/VP ) 2
Since VGG = 1V , VGS = -1V ID = 8mA [ 1 – (-1/-3.5) ] 2
ID = 4.082 mA
Computing for RS:
Resistors are external components of the circuit, therefore assigning resistance values in design is greatly discouraged.
VGS = -IDRs
RD = -IS/ VGS
RS = -4.082 mA/-1 V
RS = 245 Ω
…standard coimmercial values can be used in actual design, but for the purpose of accuracy of results between the computed and simulated value, rounding off of values is avoided.
Computing for RD:
RD = VDD - VDS - IDRS /ID
RD = 25V – 12.5V -
(4.082mA)(245Ω) /4.082mA
RD = 2.8175 kΩ
Simulated Output:

Computed Values: VGS = -1V VDD = 25V
VDS = 12.5V ID = 4.082 mA
RD = 2.817 kΩ RS = 245 Ω
The simulated and computed values closely match. RG does not need any strenous computation since it is only present to ensure that Vi ( ac voltage input) appears at the input io the FET ampflifier.
![]()
![]()

![]()

Input (Gate-source loop):
VG – VGS - IDRS = 0 , wherein VG = VDDR2/R1+R2
VGS = VG - IDRS
… the input loop is a linear equation, therefore its relationship is proportional.
At VGS = 0 VGS = VG - IDRS
0 = VG - IDRS
VG = IDRS

Ouput (Drain-source loop):
VDD – IDRD – VDS - IDRS = 0
RD = VDD - VDS - IDRS / ID
Shockley’s Equation:
ID = IDSS ( 1 – VGS/VP ) 2
..IDSS is expressed in EWB as conductance coefficient (b):
b = IDSS/|VP|2
b = 8mA/|-3.5|2
b = 0.000653 , this is the value given in the FET characterisitics
Computing for ID:
..in order to ensure that our FET is in proper operation, VGS = -1 is intended which is approximately one-thirds of the pinch-off voltage and an ID which is half of the maximum drain current.
ID = IDSS ( 1 – VGS/VP ) 2
Since VGG = 1V , VGS = -1V ID = 8mA [ 1 – (-1/-3.5) ] 2
ID = 4.082 mA
Computing for RS:
Resistors are external components of the circuit, therefore assigning resistance values in design is greatly discouraged. In order to solve for Rs, we must first assume a value of VG..
Let VG = 1 V,
VGS = VG - IDRS
RS = VG - VGS/ ID
RS = 1V – (-1V)/ 4.082mA
RS = 490 Ω
…standard coimmercial values can be used in actual design, but for the purpose of accuracy of results between the computed and simulated value, rounding off of values is avoided.
Computing for RD:
RD = VDD - VDS - IDRS/ ID
RD = 25V – 12.5V - (4.082mA)(490Ω) /4.082mA
RD = 2.573 kΩ
Computing for R1:
VG = VDDR2/R1+R2
VGR1 + VGR2 = VDDR2
R1 = VDDR2 - VGR2/VG
R1 = R2(VDD - VG)/VG
..since R2 is usually less than R1, it is ideal to assume a value for R2
R1
= 100 kΩ(25V – 1V)/1V
R1 = 2.4 MΩ
Simulated Output:

Computed Values: VGS = -1V VDD = 25V
VDS = 12.5V ID = 4.082 mA
RD = 2.573 kΩ RS = 490Ω
VG = 1V R1 = 100 kΩ R2 = 2.4 MΩ
The simulated and computed values closely match.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Voltage feedback bias is not applicable for JFET’s because it only conducts a negative gate voltage while this biasing usually employs the use of positive voltage which is feedback from the voltage source. Depletion MOSFET which can still use the Shockley’s equation can be used for voltage feedback biasing since this device can conduct beyond its maximum drain current ratings. Also it can conduct a positive voltage as its gate potential. But ideally, voltage feedback can be of best used for enhancement-type MOSFET, but its calculation is much a different approach compared to D-MOSFET since Shockley’s equation is not applicable for this device.

Since IG = 0 mA, VGS = VDS.
-VGG – IGRG – VGS = 0
VGG = - VGS
Ouput (Drain-source loop):
VDD – IDRD – VDS = 0
RD = VDD - VDS/ID
Shockley’s Equation:
ID = IDSS ( 1 – VGS/VP ) 2
Conductance coefficient (b):
..the conductance coefficeent of Depletion-MOSET is different from JFET..here is its equation:
b = 2IDSS/|VP|2
b = 2*4mA/|-3.5|2
b = 0.00065306
Computing for ID:
.. VGS = VDS, since VDS = VDD/2…VDS = 12.5V.
ID = IDSS ( 1 – VGS/VP ) 2
ID = 8mA [ 1 – (12.5/-3.5) ] 2
ID = 83.59 mA
Computing for RD:
RD = 25V- 12.5V/83.59 mA
RD = 149.54 Ω
…standard coimmercial values can be used in actual design, but for the purpose of accuracy of results between the computed and simulated value, rounding off of values is avoided.
Simulated Output:

Computed Values: VGS = 12.5 V VDD = 25V
VDS = 12.5V ID = 83.59 mA
RD = 149.54 Ω
The simulated and computed values closely match. RG does not need any strenous computation since it is only present to ensure that Vi ( ac voltage input) appears at the input io the FET ampflifier.
note: PDF downloads will soon be available.